微软旗下的ＣｈａｔＧＰＴ比搜索巨无霸谷歌旗下的ＢＡＲＤ厉害是什么原因？？？

donzhtm

微软旗下的ChatGPT比搜索巨无霸谷歌旗下的BARD厉害是什么原因？？？
大家知道训练ＡＩ需要样本，按理说，如果训练素材仅限于公共范畴的公开网站页面内容，谷歌搜索体现出的文字处理能力应该比微软ＢＩＮＧ的强上很多，

但是现在ＡＩ方面训练的结果看，微软旗下的ＧＰＴ比谷歌的ＡＩ强很多，

https://www.theguardian.com/tech ... ttle-with-microsoft

想问一下，有没有可能是训练素材的质量导致的？？？

说得阴谋论一点，训练的素材来源，除了公共的公开材料，大家都知道微软的Office卖的很好，世界上几乎所有国家的政府机构和大多数消费者都用Office产品，而且这个趋势一直持续了将近３０年，（后来谷歌也有docs，但是销量远不如Office产品）

大家都知道谷歌是一家广告公司，而谷歌扫描邮件，根据内容推送广告是早已有之的做法，

所以微软在训练样本的方面，有没有可能也是因为使用了Office产品扫描过的非公开文档，从而获得了远大于谷歌训练ＡＩ使用的素材的语料库从而获得了现今的优势？？？


你的问题我问了ChatGPT，这是它给出的回答。

微软旗下的 ChatGPT 和谷歌旗下的 BERT 实际上是不同类型的 AI 模型，每个模型都有其特定的优势和功能。因此，说其中一个模型比另一个模型更强大是不妥当的。

ChatGPT 是一种自然语言生成模型，专门用于回答用户提出的问题，生成可读性较高的文本。它是基于 OpenAI 的大型语言生成模型 GPT-3 训练的。

BERT 则是一种自然语言处理模型，其主要功能是深入理解语句的语义。它可以用于分类、推理和问答任务等。

总的来说，如果你需要生成可读性较高的文本，那么 ChatGPT 可能是一个更好的选择；如果你需要在文本中进行深入语义分析，那么 BERT 则是一个更好的选择。



https://www.theguardian.com/tech ... ttle-with-microsoft
Google AI chatbot Bard sends shares plummeting after it gives wrong answer

Chatbot Bard incorrectly said James Webb Space Telescope was first to take pictures of planet outside Earth’s solar system
Dan Milmo and agency
Thu 9 Feb 2023 01.47 GMT
First published on Thu 9 Feb 2023 01.28 GMT

Google’s response to ChatGPT has got off to an embarrassing start after its new artificial intelligence-powered chatbot gave a wrong answer in a promotional video, as investors wiped more than $100bn (£82bn) off the value of the search engine’s parent company, Alphabet.

The sell-off on Wednesday came amid investor fears that Microsoft, which is deploying an ChatGPT-powered version of its Bing search engine, will damage Google’s business. Alphabet stock slid by 9% during regular trading in the US but was flat after hours.

Experts pointed out that promotional material for Bard, Google’s competitor to Microsoft-backed ChatGPT, contained an error in the response by the chatbot to: “What new discoveries from the James Webb space telescope (JWST) can I tell my nine-year old about?”
Illustration shows the ChatGPT AI software
‘ChatGPT needs a huge amount of editing’: users’ views mixed on AI chatbot
Read more

Bard’s response – in a video demo posted online – includes an answer suggesting the JWST was used to take the very first pictures of a planet outside the Earth’s solar system, or exoplanets.

The error was picked up by experts including Grant Tremblay, an astrophysicist at the US Center for Astrophysics, who tweeted: “Not to be a ~well, actually~ jerk, and I’m sure Bard will be impressive, but for the record: JWST did not take ‘the very first image of a planet outside our solar system’”.

Bruce Macintosh, the director of University of California Observatories, tweeted: “Speaking as someone who imaged an exoplanet 14 years before JWST was launched, it feels like you should find a better example?”

Google said the error, first reported by Reuters, underlined the need for testing new systems. Bard has been released to a team of specialist testers and has yet to be rolled out to the public.

“This highlights the importance of a rigorous testing process, something that we’re kicking off this week with our trusted tester program,” a Google spokesperson said. “We’ll combine external feedback with our own internal testing to make sure Bard’s responses meet a high bar for quality, safety and groundedness in real-world information.”
The Google and OpenAI logos
How will Google and Microsoft AI chatbots affect us and how we work?
Read more

Bard is based on a so-called large language AI model, a type of neural network, which mimics the underlying architecture of the brain in computer form. It is fed vast amounts of text from the internet in a process that teaches it how to generate responses to text-based prompts. However, this can also lead to the chatbot repeating errors from the information that it absorbs.

Google also gave a live-streamed presentation in Paris on Wednesday that did not include details of how and when it would integrate Bard into its core search function. A day earlier, Microsoft held an event in which it announced that it was launching a public version of its Bing search with ChatGPT functions integrated.

Gil Luria, a senior software analyst at DA Davidson, said: “While Google has been a leader in AI innovation over the last several years, they seemed to have fallen asleep on implementing this technology into their search product.

“Google has been scrambling over the last few weeks to catch up on search and that caused the announcement to be rushed and the embarrassing mess-up of posting a wrong answer during their demo.”

Alphabet, whose main business is Google, is coming off a disappointing fourth quarter as advertisers cut spending. Microsoft is a key backer of the company behind ChatGPT, the San Francisco-based OpenAI, and its move to integrate ChatGPT technology into its products including search has forced Google, also a big investor in AI, to take action.

“People are starting to question: is Microsoft going to be a formidable competitor now against Google’s really bread-and-butter business?” said King Lip, the chief strategist at BakerAvenue Wealth Management, which owns Alphabet and Microsoft shares.

Lip cautioned that concerns about Alphabet may be overblown, saying: “I think still Bing is a far, far cry away from Google’s search capabilities.”

… as 2023 gathers pace, and you’re joining us from Ecuador, we have a small favour to ask. A new year means new opportunities, and we're hoping this year gives rise to some much-needed stability and progress. Whatever happens, the Guardian will be there, providing clarity and fearless, independent reporting from around the world, 24/7.

Times are tough, and we know not everyone is in a position to pay for news. But as we’re reader-funded, we rely on the ongoing generosity of those who can afford it. This vital support means millions can continue to read reliable reporting on the events shaping our world. Will you invest in the Guardian this year?

Unlike many others, we have no billionaire owner, meaning we can fearlessly chase the truth and report it with integrity. 2023 will be no different; we will work with trademark determination and passion to bring you journalism that’s always free from commercial or political interference. No one edits our editor or diverts our attention from what’s most important.

With your support, we’ll continue to keep Guardian journalism open and free for everyone to read. When access to information is made equal, greater numbers of people can understand global events and their impact on people and communities. Together, we can demand better from the powerful and fight for democracy.

Whether you give a little or a lot, your funding is vital in powering our reporting for years to come. If you can, please support us on a monthly basis from just $2. It takes less than a minute to set up, and you can rest assured that you’re making a big impact every single month in support of open, independent journalism. Thank you.